| 
             
            New Delhi, 20 Sep 2015 
			
			
			Maj Gen Satbir Singh, SM (Retd) 
			
			
			Advisor United Front of Ex Servicemen & Chairman IESM 
			
			
			Mobile: 9312404269014110570 
			Email:satbirsm@gmail.com 
			
			
			  
			
			
			Shri Manohar Parrikar 
			
			
			Hon’ble Raksha Mantri  
			
			
			104, South Block, New Delhi 
			
			
			17 Sep 2015 
			
			
			Hon’ble Raksha Mantri, 
			
			
			
			SERIOUS SHORTCOMINGS IN THE IMPLEMENT OF ONE RANK ONE PENSION (OROP) 
			AS READ OUT BY RAKSHA MANTRI 
			
			
			1. Much awaited announcement on the Implementation of One Rank One 
			Pension (OROP) as read out by you on 05th Sep 2015 has 
			some serious shortcomings.  If not corrected, will not only dilute 
			the OROP but will destroy its approved definition.  The assurances 
			given to the Defence Fraternity will remain unfulfilled.  OROP had 
			been denied to us for the past 42 years when OROP in the form 
			Military Pension was withdrawn. Pensions for Military Personnel were 
			reduced from 70% to 50% while that the civilian employees were 
			increased from 33% to 50%.  The ends of justice would have been met, 
			had the Military Pensions were also proportionality increased or age 
			of retirement brought on parity with civil. 
			
			
			2. The seven serious shortcomings in the implementation of OROP as 
			announced by you on 05 Sep 2015 are as under:-  
			
				- 
				
				
				Instead of equalizing the pensions every year as required as per 
				the approved definition, the Govt has announced equalization 
				after 5 years.  This would totally defeat the definition of OROP.  
				Large number of senior defence personnel will start drawing less 
				pension than juniors.  This would result in One Rank Five 
				Pensions and not One Rank One Pension. This is not acceptable. 
				Veterans have software to overcome the administrative problems 
				being quoted for the government.  
			 
			
				- 
				
				
				The Govt plans to order one man commission to decide on the 
				periodicity of the equalization of pension and other anomalies 
				and has given six months time to the commission.  The purpose of 
				such a committee is not understood particularly since all issues 
				have been resolved as stated by you after the last time the file 
				was sent to finance ministry. This is grossly unfair and not 
				acceptable.  If committee is to be ordered, it must consist of 
				five members: - three from ex-servicemen, one serving defence 
				personnel and one from MoD.  Such committee should be given only 
				one month period to submit its report and within 15 days 
				thereafter it must be processed and final decision implemented.  
			 
			
				- 
				
				
				During our discussions with the Personal Secretary to the 
				Hon’ble Prime Minister, base year 2013 – 2014 was accepted, that 
				means as on 31 Mar 2014.  However, in the Note issued by the 
				Defence Minister, calendar year 2013 has been mentioned, that 
				too the average of the calendar year.  This is not acceptable. 
				  
			 
			
				- 
				
				
				The Govt plans to give arrears wef 01 Jul 2014 instead of 01 Apr 
				2014 The Govt has deprived the veterans three months of arrears. 
				Once a Welfare Scheme has been sanctioned by the Govt, why is it 
				being diluted to the disadvantage of defence veterans? Further 
				if the date is changed to 01 Jul 2014 then the financial year 
				must also change to 2014-2015.  
			 
			
			
			
			
			3. The above may please to corrected before the issue of Govt 
			Notification on OROP.  You are also requested to incorporate reps of 
			ESM for the preparations of Draft Govt Letter.   May we request you 
			to kindly grant meeting at the earliest to discuss all the above 
			issues please.  
			
			
			With regards, 
			
			
			Yours Sincerely, 
			
			
			Maj Gen Satbir Singh, SM (Retd)   
			                                                       
			
			
			Advisor United Front of Ex Servicemen & Chairman IESM  
			
            
            
             
             
            
            Disclaimer  
            Copyright 
           |