New Delhi, 01
June 2003
Indian
defence forces lack two major ingredients and these are force
multipliers like AWACS Command and Control, and Jointness.
The first is hardware specific and while the IAF had been clamouring
for it, the Indian Navy cleverly got EW capable KA-31 helicopters
and also fitted IW systems with ELTA EL/M 2022 radars with ESM, into
their Dornier aircraft and hope to fit the same equipment into TU142
aircraft.
China
had pitched to get the Phalcon AWACS system for fitment into their
Russian IL-76s by ELTA of Israel, but since USA had some patents on
it the Israeli request for this arrangement was denied. India has
thus scored a sixer as media recently reported that the Phalcon had
been cleared by USA for supply to India, just before the Israeli PM
visits India and the Indian PM may meet Bush during the forthcoming
G-8 Meet.
The
timing is interesting and we see the clever hand of the National
Security Adviser Brajesh Mishra in this clearance. Let us hope he
can attend to Jointness too and the AWACS (Airborne Warning And
Control System) becomes a joint medium to provide Intelligence,
Command, Control & Communications (C4I) to all the
three services.
This
is an IDC analysis of the much awaited clearance of the Indo-Israeli
Phalcon AWACS deal that has come from US as promised by Richard
Armitage. The system is defence oriented and will assist in keeping
the Indian Ocean under surveillance and hence we harp on Jointness
which is now proven to be a Principle of War.
The
CDS system was the harbinger but it is clear that non appointment of
an incumbent has led to Inter Service competition. We hope that the
induction of this very advanced system will see the three services
operate the AWACS facility like the NATO nations operate it with
joint country crews. It will also be a boost to India's ballistic
missile defences and Indian strategists must appreciate this
technicality.
The
clearance has come before the scheduled visit to India by the
Israeli Prime Minister. Ariel Sharon certainly realises the
sensitivity of the deal, after all during war with Syria over Beka'a
Valley in 1982, the Israelis mercilessly decimated the Syrian Air
Force in conjunction with their excellent battle management system.
Then they had the E-2C "Hawkeye" AWACS platforms, static
balloons, RF-4E reconnaissance fighters, OV-1 "Mohawk"
battlefield surveillance platforms and specially equipped Boeing
RC-707s. Additionally all the Israeli fighters had data-links to
process real time information and also the excellent Shafrir and
AIM-9L "all aspect" WVR (Within Visual Range) missiles.
The
Syrian fighters were tracked as soon as they left the runaway and
the Israelis enjoyed the vital tactical advantage of surprise. The
result was the loss of over 80 Syrian aircraft as against 2 Israeli
fighters. While presently the positive signals about the Phalcon
radar system have caught the attention of the national media, India
should approach the Israeli Prime Minister to secure the prestigious
Israeli BPI (Boost-Phase Intercept) project, jointly developed with
United States BMDO (Ballistic Missile Defence Organisation), to
destroy attacking theatre ballistic missiles in the boost phase
itself. Since it is a purely defence-oriented system one hopes that
the United States will be co-operative.
During
boost-phase the attacking ballistic missile is comparatively slower
and at the same time a source of considerable IR (Infra-Red)
radiation and thus visible and vulnerable with a very definite
behaviour pattern and easily detectable by aerial sources or
satellites. Decoys are yet to be fielded, making interception
easier. Decoys are deployed when the attacking ballistic missile
leaves the atmosphere and travels in vacuum in space. In vacuum the
heavier warheads and lighter decoys move at similar speed and to
confuse the enemy some decoys can be programmed to imitate the
signals of real warheads. "Anti-simulation" measures are
often adopted by shielding the real warheads in "decoy
balloons". Again during the terminal phase although the decoys
burn out in atmospheric friction, the warheads inherit great speed
and in course of time will attain extensive manoeuvres to defeat
anti-missile missiles.
The
Israelis are reportedly working on high-altitude HA-10 UAVs
(Unmanned Aerial
Vehicles) that will fire missile interceptors toward the attacking
ballistic missiles during boost phase. They are directed by a
command-and-control system developed by Tadiran Electronics Ltd. and
the aircraft, in turn, feed a search and track system that can scan
the area to determine whether the enemy is firing a real missile or
a decoy. Their passive electro-optic sensors will have the
capability to detect and track ballistic missiles during their boost
phase. If the missile is fired towards Israel, the system decides
which UAV will fire its interceptor. The UAV then fires missiles
being developed by the Israel Armament Development Authority
(Rafael), in a project called MOAB (Missile Optimised Anti-Ballistic
Missile System), toward the enemy rocket at the boost phase. The
attacking missile destroyed at that stage falls on the aggressor's
territory along with its NBC (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical)
payload. In this context the deterrent value of a Boost-Phase
Intercept System is well apparent. The UAV is armed with extensive
sensors for autonomous navigation and targeting and is able to
successfully complete its mission and return to base even if the
link from the controllers is cut off.
Recently,
the Israelis have shifted their attention to target the enemy’s
mobile missile launchers following the tactic of BLPI (Before Launch
Phase Intercept). There will be far fewer launchers than missiles.
Emphasis will be on developing a very high-speed, precise
air-launched missile. To carry this new missile, Israel wants to
refine the BPI concept. While MOAB/IBIS system is a combination of
UAVs with two AAMs (Air-to-Air Missiles) for the BPI role, now
Israeli planners envision a UAV that carries perhaps as many as 10
ASMs (Air-to-Surface Missiles) internally for a reduced radar
signature. Such a design may also require retractable landing gear,
stealth qualities and shaping and jet engines rather than
propellers. A second long-range UAV, designed to loiter over enemy
territory for up to 60 hours, would carry fused and multispectral
sensors designed to pull additional and more precise identification
and location information from the targets.
(With
Inputs from Sayan Mazumdar)
Disclaimer Copyright |