New Delhi, 20
August 2003
The
NDA government did little to answer the charges leveled by the
opposition,
covering
5 years of their rule. In the end the no confidence motion turned
out to be an exercise in futility. Mohan Guruswamy gives us all the
details in this telling piece.
“Let
Them Eat Cake!”
By
Mohan Guruswamy
With
the outcome foregone, the two-day debate on the no-confidence motion
could have still been noteworthy if it had any content in it.
Unfortunately it had little of substance in it. Sonia Gandhi’s
speech was well written. The Prime Minister’s was listless. LK
Advani’s was irrelevant. Jaipal Reddy’s speech focusing mostly
on George Fernandes was little more than invective packaged in
language that only he can conjure up. George’s defense of himself
was unconvincing. Mulayam Singh Yadav was his usual self, while
Somnath Chatterjee induced somnolence.
Only
the Congress backbencher, Satyavrat Chaturvedi did justice to his
brief moment under the spotlight by making a superb speech that
damned the government for its many failures with barbed facts from a
full quiver. Sushma Swaraj’s reply that followed was inadequate,
hollow, shrill and verged on being insensitive.
Chaturvedi
stuck to the nitty gritty. Unlike his leader, he had no need to show
that he was now improved. Unlike the Prime Minister, he had no need
to show that he was in fine fettle, physically and intellectually.
Unlike the Deputy Prime Minister, he had no need to rely on an
Amitabh Bachchan’s testimonial, which in itself can be of dubious
value given that he has endorsed so many lemons recently. Unlike
Jaipal Reddy, he had no need to show off his English as he spoke in
Hindi. Unlike Mulayam Singh Yadav, he didn’t have to resort to
abuse as he had the facts that mattered at his command. Unlike
Sushma Swaraj, he did not have to be shrill and dilatory. The facts
were hard and he flung them at the treasury benches with unerring
aim.
The
BJP led government had promised an economic growth rate of 8% when
what it achieved was less than 4.4%. The average GDP growth for the
post liberalization Congress era (1992–97) was a good 6.7%,
whereas for the five years that followed (1997–2002) it dropped
down to 5.5%. In 2002–03 it was just 4.4%.
No
wonder Sonia Gandhi termed dreams of 8% GDP growth as “Mungeri
Lal ke sapne!” The agricultural sector has been hit even more.
The Congress saw it grow at 4.7%, while in the following five years
it had averaged a mere 1.8%, and then went down to –3.1% last
year. Industry growth of 7.6% fell to 4.5%, but was up last year to
6.1%. The only sector that had shown a growth in the post Congress
period has been Services, which grew to 8.1% from 7.5%. But even
this gain has been mostly due to the 14% growth of spending on the
bureaucracy, which now accounts for 6.6% of the national income.
Chaturvedi’s blows therefore struck where it hurt most.
During
the same period the total public debt has grown from about 66.5% of
GDP to 80% of GDP in 2001–02. The GDP that year was Rs.2, 296,000
crores. But that doesn’t in itself tell the full story. The
Debt/GDP ratio kept declining from 1992–93 and touched its lowest
in 1996–97 to 65.1% and has climbed each year to surpass the high
water mark of 76.5% in 1992–93. Quite clearly financial management
suffered.
The
brunt of this mismanagement burden was borne as usual by the people
with the least say in our affairs. According to our poverty
standards, which are based on per capita consumer expenditure to
provide an average intake of 2400 calories in rural areas and 2100
calories in urban areas, no less than 28.6% of the population lives
below the poverty line. But in reality the poverty line in India is
actually a hunger line, which means those living below this food
expenditure level are actually going hungry each day. In other words
nearly 300 million Indians go to bed hungry each night. If the more
widely accepted international standard of poverty, an income of
US$1.0 per day or Rs.47.0 per day is applied, no less than 40% of
Indians are impoverished. Chaturvedi turned the knife hard when he
added that many thousands still die of starvation in India.
Chaturvedi
then taunted the government on its promise to build 2 million homes
each year, improve and create jobs for the millions who crowd the
job market each year. Quite expectedly the promise of building
houses turned out to be quite hollow. Not only hollow but also
lop-sided. But Sushma Swaraj was quite approving of what was
achieved by HUDCO, the very same PSU that picked a cell phone tab of
several lakhs for her friend Ananth Kumar. She said that HUDCO
invested over Rs.13,000 crores during the tenure of the Vajpayee
government, while all that was achieved by HUDCO in the previous
years was about Rs.10, 000 crores. This may be true, but nowhere
near 10 million houses were built. Even Sushma only claimed half as
many.
The
charge that was being made was that promises were not kept, not that
the Congress did better! But what is worse is the skew towards urban
areas. As opposed to 6798 schemes for the urban areas with an outlay
of Rs.9672.5 crores, the rural areas only got 2062 schemes with an
outlay of Rs.4064 crores. But this is not all. HUDCO invested
another Rs.19,000 crores on 1004 urban infrastructure schemes such
as flyovers, mass transit systems and loans to various state
government agencies. I don’t suppose that even Sushma needs
reminding that 70% of India still lives in rural areas. And a
government that promised to spend 60% of all Plan funds on rural
areas, ostensibly recognizing their deplorable condition, should
have done better?
On
the jobs front the performance of the NDA government has been quite
pathetic. The total number of jobs in the organized sector witnessed
a contraction each and every year of its existence. In the past five
years about 2 million jobs were lost. No less than 43 million young
people are registered with employment exchanges all over the
country. In a country where almost 320 million are below the age of
30, the creation of jobs becomes the most important national
priority. Clearly the NDA government’s performance is not just
wanting in economic terms, but has serious potential national
security implications. Presumably recognizing the importance of
having a skilled work force, the BJP led government promised to
spend over 6% of GDP on education. Far from reaching this, the
spending actually has fallen to 2.9% of GDP or Rs.75, 389 crores
last year. This has declined from 3.1% of GDP the year before.
What
did Sushma Swaraj say in reply? She just did not touch the issues
raised by Chaturvedi. To her, the major achievements of the NDA
government, other than that it survived, is that there are no
waiting lists for telephone and domestic gas connections. She
claimed quite truthfully that till 1998 there were only 1.86 crore
telephone connections and in just five years the NDA government
added 3 crores more. When she reminded the house that MP’s had no
longer to dispense with coupons for out of turn gas connections, I
am sure that many would have wistfully remembered the good old days
when coupons meant cash. She was next to ecstatic over the uplinking
facilities provided to as many as 77 TV channels. But she didn’t
reply to the questions posed by Chaturvedi. She seemed to be saying
we gave some of the hungry, cake to eat instead?
Rousseau
in his “Confessions” tells of a great princess who, on being
informed that the country people had no bread replied, “Let them
eat cake!” This statement is often, and incorrectly attributed to
Marie Antoinette, wife of the French ruler Louis XVI. Nevertheless
Marie Antoinette was a frivolous and callous person who came to be
disliked by the French people. On October 16, 1793 she was taken in
an open cart, and publicly guillotined while Parisians cheered. Ever
the royal, she apologized to the hangman for having stepped on his
foot: “Pardon me Monsieur, I did not mean it!” Of course she
didn’t mean it. Neither did Sushma!
Disclaimer Copyright |