New
Delhi, 04
July
2004
The
recently announced Naval Doctrine envisages the adoption of a
submerged nuclear missile deterrent, to launch the so called
‘second strike capability’. Our researcher Sayan Majumdar
speculates on the totality of the technology, systems, combat units,
communications and integration with the National Command Authority,
required to make such a capability a reality…..
Submerged
Nuclear Deterrent
November
15, 1960 was a Red Letter day for the United States Navy (USN) and
for the world naval community. USS George Washington, the first
nuclear powered Ballistic Missile Submarine (SSBN) of the USN began
its operational patrol on that day. USS George Washington was armed
with solid-fuel Polaris A-1 submarine launched ballistic missiles (SLBM)
that could be launched from under water.
The
SSBNs have since matured into submerged mobile silos as they are
reasonably well protected from pre-emptive strike and thus ideal
instruments for nuclear deterrence. These submarines cannot be
eliminated in a first strike, yet their hydra-headed SLBMs can
inflict devastating reprisals on a rogue nuclear aggressor. The
present force of the USN consists of Ohio Class SSBNs armed with
Trident II D-5 SLBMs with ranges in excess of 7,000 km that
increases the sea room in which they can hide and still keep their
targets within range. Their accuracy is as good as land based
inter-continental ballistic missiles (ICBM) thanks to stellar
inertial navigation system (INS).
The
Naval Doctrine recently propounded by the Indian Navy has correctly
stressed the use of submarines both conventional and nuclear
powered, in conjunction with the stated nuclear “retaliatory
second strike” capability. A significant proportion of the
valuable military and industrial targets of India’s potential
adversaries lie near their coastlines making them highly vulnerable
to naval strikes.
It
is quite likely that an indigenous Indian nuclear submarine referred
to as advanced technology vessel (ATV) will be in operation by about
2006, to be followed later by sister submarines, to boost India’s
nuclear “second strike capability”. The weaponry of the ATV
needs to be selected carefully and also the focus should shift to
underwater Very Low Frequency/Extremely Low Frequency (VLF/ELF) and
laser communications for effective coordination of these ATVs with
the National Command Authority (NCA).
Earlier
media reports had indicated the ATV to be a version of the Russian
Charlie Class nuclear powered cruise missile armed submarine (SSGN),
but it is unlikely that the Indian Navy will choose such an older
basic technology for operations at the turn of millennium,
especially when advanced technology is available from Russia and
France. Another option is stated to be a modified variant of the
massive Project 949A Antey Oscar II Class SSGN. A customised
development of Russian Project 885 Yasen/Graney Class Nuclear
powered Attack Submarine (SSN) also referred to as Severodvinsk
Class, which is a further derivative of the Project 971 Akula Class
SSN and features a significant cruise missile capability with eight
vertical launch tubes aft of the sail, appears to be yet another
choice. Although a SSN, the dimensions of Severodvinsk Class
approach the dimensions of the French Le Redoutable Class ballistic
missile submarines. The hull is made of low magnetic steel, with
spherical bow sonar and canted torpedo tubes. In any case the ATV
project is demanding simultaneous development and integration of
advanced technologies in the fields of nuclear propulsion, missiles,
missile guidance, “cold launch” from submerged submarine and
precise navigation and position fixing techniques.
The
exact nature of our ATV will only become apparent after it enters
service but the Sagarika (Oceanic) SLBM or submarine launched cruise
missiles (SLCM), due to enter service with the Indian Navy should
have a range of at least 2.000 km and provide greater operational
sea room and ability to operate far from the enemy coast.
Near
enemy coastlines ATV will be vulnerable to enemy conventional
powered hunter-killer submarines (SSK) equipped with air-independent
propulsion (AIP). If a SLBM or SLCM of decent range can be developed
the ATV will retain the choice of operating in certain heavily
defended patrol areas of Arabian and South China Seas and in the
Indian Ocean, while keeping the potential targets within range. The
Soviet Navy followed this “Bastion Concept” during Cold War days
with relative success against the formidable anti-submarine warfare
(ASW) forces of the United States Navy and her allies.
Escorts
and Weapons
The
ATV will require escorts and the induction of Project 971M Akula II
Class SSN like Gephard from Russia seems possible. The naval
officials should ensure integration of the latest range of sensors
and weapon systems available from Russia and elsewhere. Structurally
these submarines have the latest technologies; they are very quiet
in comparison to other Russian vessels and significantly are the
product of advanced Russian research on marine animals, notably
dolphins.
It
can be assumed that these submarines "by default" will
carry a formidable array of potent torpedoes and the Indo-Russian
BrahMos Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles (ASCM). However every effort
should be made to retain the capacity of firing the submarine
launched Raduga RK-55 Granit (SS-N-21 Sampson) Land Attack Cruise
Missiles (LACM) twelve of which are carried by Russian Navy Akulas
and are fired from standard 533 mm torpedo tubes. LACMs especially
submarine launched, are invaluable assets of any major navy, and
tactically may be used in decimating enemy overland communications,
command and control centres and powerful air defence installations
–– before launching extensive barrage air attacks followed by
ground invasion.
If
the Russian LACM is not available because of Missile Technology
Control Regime (MTCR) restrictions, efforts should be made to
develop an indigenous LACM of fair range and capacity, or
re-engineer and enhance the capability of BrahMos ASCM. The BrahMos
developments indeed seem to be approaching that direction with 900
km and 1400 km “Super BrahMos” variants. This aspect will
enhance the Indian Navy's capability to influence the
"air-land" battle and since this naval application is
likely to appeal to politicians and stretegic planners as well, the
Navy will be able to press for increased budget in return. As the
ATVs will represent a cohesive cluster of strategic capability
–– with perhaps 12 to 16 SLBMs or SLCMs –– there will be
unacceptable damage if one unit is lost. Thus nuclear-warhead armed
SLCMs should be distributed on SSNs and major surface combatants for
distribution of our strategic capability and to complicate the tasks
of our adversaries.
The
Indian Navy could also opt for the exceptionally high speed (200
Knots) Russian Shkval (Squall) rocket propelled 'torpedo' which is
capable of destroying even super-carriers with a couple of hits and
provides the targeted vessels very little chance to perform evasive
manoeuvres. This 'torpedo' may also be used as a "revenge"
weapon, which may be fired along the bearing of an incoming enemy
torpedo. The Russians have meanwhile disclosed the existence of
non-nuclear tipped Shkval-E for the export market.
Action
Information System
It
is generally regarded that the underwater acoustic sensor suite and
combat action information system of United States and West European
submarines are superior to their Russian contemporaries. Hopefully
the Indian Navy is set to "absorb" the key technologies of
the Franco-Spanish Scorpene Class SSKs, which includes innovations
inspired directly by France's new-generation nuclear attack and
ballistic missile submarines. It is difficult to ascertain the
completion status of the Akula II Class submarines for the Indian
Navy, but it may be possible to retrofit the Franco-Spanish
technology especially the sonar and other acoustic sensor suite and
automated action information/combat management system, to the
subsequent units of the ATV and Akulas if these are found to be
superior.
Propulsion
We
envisage that gradually the nuclear powered submarines will
predominate over conventional types in the IN. If future units of
Scorpene class can accommodate a small nuclear Pressurized Water
Reactor (PWR), it is most welcome. The French are expert in
developing small yet reliable marine reactors of exceptional
standard leading to the development of small 2,670 ton Rubis and
Amethyste Class nuclear attack submarines. The Indian Navy however
should retain a decent portion of conventional attack
“hunter-killer” submarines with AIP for efficiency of operations
on the continental shelf region and insertion of Special Forces on
enemy beachheads.
Security
of Bases
Although
submerged submarines are relatively invulnerable, the submarines
while in bases are susceptible to pre-emptive strike and sabotage.
Special facilities are required for ballistic missile submarines and
this makes their location easily identifiable and well known.
Surveillance devices such as satellites and electronic monitoring
enable the arrival and departure of ballistic missile submarines to
be closely observed. The departures of ballistic missile armed
submarines are accompanied by easily identifiable behavior of the
escort vessels as the submarines are checked up for acoustic and
magnetic signatures and clip-in towed arrays are fitted. Again
British ballistic missile submarines have to leave their Scottish
base at Faslane through “narrows” at Rhu just north of
Helensburgh in full public view. The French Force Oceanique
Stretegeque (FOST) ballistic missile submarines face similar
problems while leaving Ile Longue Naval Base at Brest Bay.
Naturally
radical steps are taken for security of naval bases. The Gremikha
SSBN Base at Kola peninsula of Russia has huge SSBN “pens”
blasted out of granite rocks of the adjacent cliffs to ensure the
survival of the Typhoon Class ballistic missile submarines. The
other base at Zapadnaya Lista is also closely guarded. Again highly
trained dolphins guard the USN SSBN bases of Bangor in Washington
State and King’s Bay at Georgia. These animate sonar of these
dolphins far exceeds any artificial set. In addition to radical
measures the Indian Navy also should plan to secure rights for using
overseas bases for proper strategic distribution of assets and
operational flexibility.
Communications
The
Indian Navy had anticipated the importance of Very Low Frequency (VLF)
underwater transmissions long ago. As part of an ambitious naval
modernisation program, during the mid-1980s the Indian Navy had
constructed a VLF broadcasting station in Tamil Nadu. Although not
publicly declared, it was reported that the United States actively
collaborated in the project, which was completed in September 1986.
The
operational VLF facility can primarily be used by the Indian Navy to
communicate with its SSKs with trailing communication buoys at
periscope depth of 10 to 20 metres. When nuclear ATVs become
operational, the VLF facility will permit Indian National Command
Authority to issue launch orders to submerged subs at periscope
depth. VLF waves propagate almost a quarter of the globe away and
are generally immune to atmospheric disturbances caused by nuclear
detonations. Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) waves on the other hand
can penetrate to the operational “patrol depth” of the SSBNs but
huge overland infrastructure needs to be built up with 80 km long
antennae.
On
the negative side, the small bandwidth of VLF transmission limits
the rate of transmission of data, usually allowing only the
operation of slow Teletype messages. Moreover the large terrestrial
and static VLF facility would be vulnerable to enemy strikes and
even if the VLF facility is shifted deep underground in
“hardened” shelters, the communication antennae would be located
above ground and will remain vulnerable. Thus an airborne VLF
transmitter similar to the USN Take Charge And Move Out (TACAMO)
should be seriously considered for procurement and induction.
A
powerful 200KW transmitter provides the VLF transmissions in TACAMO.
The United States Navy utilizes an EC-130A/Q Hercules with a
trailing wire antennae 10km long with a drogue parachute at the end.
During transmission the aircraft flies in a continuous tight circle,
which results in over 70 percent of the wire hanging straight down
and acting as a relatively efficient vertical antennae.
Presently
the E-6 Mercury is the airborne platform of the United States TACAMO
Communications System. It provides survivable communication links
between the United States National Command Authority (NCA) and
Strategic Forces. Long range, air refuelable E-6 is a derivative of
the commercial Boeing 707 aircraft equipped with four CFM-56-2A-2
high bypass ratio fan/jet engines with thrust reversers. The weapon
system is Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP) hardened. Mission range is
over 6000 nautical miles. E-6B fulfils both TACAMO and Airborne
National Command Post (ABNCP) missions.
The
E-6 ABNCP modification program was established to upgrade TACAMO
operational capabilities by incorporating a subset of United States
Strategic Command (USSTRATCOMM) EC-135 ABNCP equipment into the E-6
aircraft. The modified aircraft have the designation changed from
E-6A to E-6B. The E-6B modified an E-6A by adding battle staff
positions and other specialised equipment. The E-6B is a
dual-mission aircraft capable of fulfilling either the E-6A mission
or the airborne strategic command post mission (“Looking
Glass”?) and is equipped with an Airborne Launch Control System (ALCS).
The ALCS is capable of launching United States ICBMs. The E-6B is
capable of performing both the TACAMO and ABNCP missions. This
modification enables USSTRATCOM to perform current and projected
TACAMO and ABNCP operational tasking and the E-6B provides
survivable Command, Control and Communications (C3) force management
communications for the NCA via multiple frequency band
communications.
Attention
has now shifted to laser based underwater communications. There is
an optical window in the blue-green part of the laser spectrum,
which enables transmission to penetrate the ocean to substantial
distances. Power requirements are considerable and the system at
least presently cannot be installed in artificial satellites. Thus
as a tactical improvisation the laser is made to be ground based,
preferably mobile, in perfect conjunction with a space based mirror
with adaptive optics being used to produce a cohesive beam.
Significantly, data transfer rate will be 300 times greater than ELF
system although the “rerouted” laser may not penetrate to the
same depth.
Conclusion
The
effective combination of nuclear powered ballistic missile armed and
coventional attack submarines coupled with underwater VLF/ELF and
laser communications will make our sea based nuclear deterrent
optimally effective. The challenge lies in front of our national
leadership and defence scientists to “secure” the proper systems
either indigenously or import them from established sources.
Disclaimer Copyright |