What
exactly is globalisation? Is globalisation a cure
for the woes of the world? Simply defined,
globalisation means the increased international or
inter-societal interaction.
Above
all, it is an idea that no entity in the world, be
it a state, nation, society, people or tribe may
exist in complete isolation from interaction and
discourse with other world elements. Thus an
important political or social event happening in one
state would also affect other states and societies,
and therefore likely elicit a state response. A
global free market, international non-state
organizations like the United Nations, or
International Monetary Fund, can be classified as
features of globalisation. Globalisation can be
regarded as a process, a concept or an existing
feature of history such as a war or revolution.
Suddenly,
the world seems to have become a smaller place, as a
person can read and know about events happening even
in a distant corner of the globe. The optimistic
term, “global village” coined in the 1990s
refers to the world becoming more and more
integrated and hence becoming much more akin to the
village system, where everyone interacts and depends
on each other for survival, and increased
co-operation towards mutual interests.
Alongside
globalisation however, ethno-nationalist and
politico-religious issues have also become more
highlighted. The impact of the Internet, and also
the media, means that news reporting of events
cannot be so easily manipulated by politicians,
state governments and powerful societal entities.
Instead, public opinion can be more easily voiced
and have a larger say in influencing social and
political matters.
Globalisation
is a byproduct brought about through the
introduction of two important technological
innovations –– the Internet and the cell-phone.
The appearance of the Internet and cellphones
undoubtedly contributed much to the process of
globalisation. Both innovations stemmed mainly out
of the need to improve communications for military
purposes. By their release into the commercial
market, the irrevocable process of bringing nations,
organizations and individuals into increased and
closer contact with each other, and the formation of
online networks, became inevitable.
The
spreading of information and ideas are not new in
concept. However, the totalitarian nature of certain
prior political governing systems, such as fascism
and communism, attempts to restrict and control the
information flow as their leaders realise the social
and political effects and impact on their governed
populations. By the inevitability of history, such
ideologies are now considered defunct because of the
defeats of their centres of power. Information flow
inevitably gives rise to a better-informed
individual and helps to promote free trade.
But
only in the late 1990s, with the onset of
technological advance, could this information theory
be fulfilled in practice. The Information Age not
only changed the political and economic landscape of
the new world order, it also revolutionised the
nature of modern warfare and security issues. From
the Gulf War in 1991 onwards, the world saw the
decline of conventional wars and a marked increase
in low intensity conflicts involving non state
actors like terrorist or militant groups. The latter
also made use of the benefits of globalisation to
pursue their own agendas through armed conflict and
terrorist acts. The Internet and the cell-phone are
used for communication and in internationalising and
publicising the terrorists’ cause.
The
onset of globalisation had not only brought about
economic and social benefits, but also heightened
the security threat to states and societies. Through
the use of the Internet, the pervasive and
regressive religious ideology of Islamic radicalism
is spread to the masses. In the late 1990s, unrest
and social violence in Indonesia was partially
attributed to Islamic radicalism taking root among
the masses, and partly because of a greater
awareness of concurrent events happening elsewhere
in the world. Terrorism, insurgencies, and militancy
have replaced largescale interstate wars to become
the foremost security threats in the world today.
The
impact of globalisation and international affairs
has brought about a heightened consciousness in
regionalism in South East Asia, and a gradual change
in the political mindset of non-interference. Events
happening in another part of the world will directly
or indirectly cause an effect on internal affairs
within a state because of the interlinked nature of
globalisation. The joint maritime patrolling effort
of the Malacca Strait by three ASEAN states ––
Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia, alongside an
external regional player ––
India, set a precedent for such increased
co-operation between states.
Interstate
co-operation is all the more necessary in dealing
with difficult social problems like the Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) virus outbreak in 2003,
the bird flu virus outbreak in late 2004, which
affected the food industry and economy, and the
Indian Ocean Tsunami disaster in December 2004.
Through pooling of resources and international
publicising via the Internet and media, states can
react in a more efficient and effective manner when
faced with unexpected contingencies.
Globalisation
is set to transform the world in unprecedented ways
in the 21st century. What states,
societies and individuals should be aware of, is how
to maximize the benefits brought about by the onset
of increased global contact. Creative ways must be
adopted in fighting terrorism at the international
level. Old mindsets and strategies must change. Two
recent important events ––
the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, and the
terrorist attack on the World Trade Centre in New
York City on September 11, 2001, became turning
points in history in marking the progress of the
world from the Industrial to the Information Age.
Globalisation,
and its two attendant features, the Internet and the
cellphone, certainly had a vast impact on
international security, and in doing so, also
influenced events in South East Asia as well.
*The
writer holds a Master of Science in Strategic
Studies from the Institute of Defense and Strategic
Studies (IDSS). He currently writes commentaries and
analytical articles on international affairs,
security issues and terrorism for newspapers.