New
Delhi, 20
June
2004
Having
recently seen the strategies adopted by our own politicians in the
just concluded General Election let us take a look at how it is
being done in America in the election year. Our colleague is in
America and has filed this report. It makes interesting reading
–– even if the logic is somewhat far fetched!
The
funeral of Ex-President Ronald Regan was a spectacular event, used
by the Republican Party to rally round all Americans, especially
Republican supporters. The article that follows reads like an
advertisement for Bush and the Republican Party! It is a bit lengthy
but interestingly it predicts that the ‘Clash of Civilisations’
is coming. It is an extremely well written article, which tries to
explain what Americans face today in the War on Terrorism. Though
written in January it is still appropriate to the situation today.
In
essence, not all has been laid on the table relative to why America
invaded Iraq. What the author Larry Abraham says pertaining to the
Third Jihad is well worth reading. It provides an entirely new
perspective over and above what Americans see on TV and read in the
papers or in Bob Woodward's new book.
As
the author points out, these are very serious times for Americans
and they need to understand what will befall them if they back out
of Iraq now for whatever reason. The issue is much bigger than just
Iraq. As Larry Abraham says in his last paragraph, "We are in
the battle of our lives, a battle which will go on for many years
possibly even generations. If we fail to understand what we are
facing or falter in the challenge of "knowing our enemy"
the results will be catastrophic."
The
upcoming November election is an extremely important decision making
time for all Americans and the rest of the free world.
The
Clash Of Civilizations And The Great Caliphate
(Another
Look at The Third Jihad)
By
Larry Abraham
I
urge all of my readers to make copies of this report and send them
to your friends and relatives. The information is too critical to be
overlooked in the madness of this election year.
Watching
and listening to the Democrat Party candidates is tantamount to
enduring the Chinese water torture. The blah, blah, blah goes on and
on and nothing of value comes out except the pain of listening to
the same nothingness over and over again. I won't take the time or
space to repeat what you have heard so many mind numbing times but
what you have not heard is crucial.
President
Bush and his administration spokesmen are not telling the American
people what they really need to know about this "war". If
they don't do that between now and November, it may cost them the
election.
The
war against terror did not begin on September 11, 2001, nor will it
end with the peaceful transition to civilian authority in Iraq,
whenever that may be. In fact, Iraq is but a footnote in the bigger
context of this encounter, but an important one nonetheless.
This
war is what the Jihadists themselves are calling the "Third
Great Jihad." They are operating within the framework of a time
line, which reaches back to the very creation of Islam in the
seventh century and are presently attempting to recreate the
dynamics, which gave rise to the religion in the first two hundred
years of its existence. No religion in history grew as fast, in its
infancy, and the reasons for the initial growth of Islam are not
hard to explain when you understand what the world was like at the
time of Muhammad's death in 632 AD. Remember that the Western Roman
Empire was in ruins and the Eastern Empire, based in Constantinople,
was trying desperately to keep the power of its early grandeur while
transitioning to Christianity as a de facto state religion. The
costs to the average person were large as he was being required to
meet the constantly rising taxes levied by the state along with the
tithes coerced by the Church.
What
Islam offered was the "carrot or the sword". If you became
a convert, your taxes were immediately eliminated, as was your
tithe. If you didn't, you faced death. The choice was not hard for
most to make, unless you were a very devoted martyr in the making.
At the beginning, even the theology was not too hard for most to
swallow, considering that both Jewry and Christianity were given
their due by the Prophet. There is but one God-Allah, and Muhammad
is His Prophet, as was Jesus, and the pre-Christian Jewish prophets
of the Torah (Old Testament). Both were called "children of the
book" –– the book being the Koran, which replaced both the
Old and New Testaments for former Christians and Jews.
With
this practical approach to spreading the "word" Islam grew
like wildfire, reaching out from the Saudi Arabian Peninsula in all
directions. This early growth is what the Muslims call the
"First" great Jihad and it met with little resistance
until Charles Martel of France, the father of Charlemagne, stopped
them in the battle of Tours in France, after they had firmly
established Islam on the Iberian Peninsula. This first onslaught
against the West continued in various forms and at various times
until Islam was finally driven out of Spain in 1492 at the battle of
Granada.
The
"Second great jihad" came with the Ottoman Turks. This
empire succeeded in bringing about the downfall of Constantinople as
a Christian stronghold and an end to Roman hegemony in all of its
forms. The Ottoman Empire was Islam's most successful expansion of
territory even though the religion itself had fractured into warring
sects and bitter rivalries with each claiming the ultimate truths in
"the ways of the Prophet". By 1683 the Ottomans had
suffered a series of defeats on both land and sea and the final,
unsuccessful attempt to capture Vienna set the stage for the
collapse of any further territorial ambitions and Islam shrunk into
various sheikhdoms, emir dominated principalities, and roving tribes
of nomads. However, by this time a growing anti Western sentiment,
blaming its internal failures on anyone but themselves, was taking
hold and setting the stage for a new revival known as Wahhabism, a
sect which came into full bloom under the House of Saud on the
Arabian Peninsula shortly before the onset of WWI. It is this
Wahhabi version of Islam, which has infected the religion itself,
now finding adherents in almost all branches and sects, especially
the Shiites.
Wahhabism
calls for the complete and total rejection or destruction of
anything and everything, which is not based in the original
teachings of The Prophet and finds its most glaring practice in the
policies of the Afghani Taliban or the Shiite practices of the late
Ayatollah Khomeini in Iran. Its Ali Pasha (Field Marshall) is now
known as Osama bin Laden, the leader of the "Third Jihad",
who is Wahhabi as were his 9/11 attack teams, 18 of which were also
Saudi.
The
strategy for this "holy war" did not begin with the
planning of the destruction of the World Trade Center. It began with
the toppling of the Shah of Iran back in the late 1970's. With his
plans and programs to "westernize" his country, along with
his close ties to the U.S. and subdued acceptance of the State of
Israel, the Shah was the soft target. Remember "America Held
Hostage"?
Thanks,
in large part to the hypocritical and disastrous policies of the
Jimmy Carter State Department, the revolution was set into motion,
the Shah was deposed, his armed forces scattered or murdered and
stage one was complete. The Third Jihad now had a base of operations
and the oil wealth to support its grand design or what they call the
"Great Caliphate".
What
this design calls for is the replacement of all secular leadership
in any country with Muslim majorities. This would include Egypt,
Turkey, Pakistan, Indonesia, all the Emirates, Sudan, Tunisia,
Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Malaysia,
Indonesia and finally what they call the "occupied territory,
" Israel.
As
a part of this strategy, forces of the Jihad will infiltrate
governments and the military as a prelude to taking control, once
the secular leadership is ousted or assassinated. Such was the case
in Lebanon leading to the Syrian occupation and in Egypt with the
murder of Anwar Sadat, along with the multiple attempts on the lives
of Hussein in Jordan, Mubarak of Egypt and Musharraf in Pakistan.
Pakistan is a particular prize because of its nuclear weapons.
(Please note al Qaeda call for the Islamic-militant overthrow of
Musharraf in Pakistan on March 25, just recently.)
The
long-range strategy of the Third Jihad counts on three strategic
goals. First, the U.S. withdrawing from the region just as it did in
Southeast Asia following Vietnam. Second, taking control of the oil
wealth in the Muslim countries, which would be upwards to 75% of
known reserves. Third, using nuclear weapons or other WMDs to
annihilate Israel. A further outcome of successfully achieving these
objectives would be to place the United Nations as the sole arbiter
in East/West negotiations and paralyse western resistance, leading
to total withdrawal from all Islamic dominated countries.
Evidence
of the Bush Administration awareness of this plan is found in the
events immediately following the 9/11 attack. The administration's
first move was to shore up Pakistan and Egypt, believing that these
two would be the next targets for al Qaeda, while Americans focused
on the disaster in New York. The administration also knew that the
most important objective was to send a loud and clear message that
the U.S. was in the region to stay, not only to shore up our allies
but to send a message to the Jihadists.
The
attack on Afghanistan was necessary to break-up a secure al Qaeda
base of operations and put their leadership on the run or in prison.
The war in Iraq also met a very strategic necessity in that no one
knew how much collaboration existed between Saddam Hussein and the
master planners of the Third Jihad or Hussein's willingness to hand
off WMDs to terrorist groups including the PLO in Israel. What was
known were serious indications of on-going collaboration as Saddam
funnelled money to families of suicide bombers attacking the
Israelis and others in Kuwait.
What
the U.S. needed to establish was a significant base of operations
smack dab in the middle of the Islamic world, in a location, which
effectively cut it in half. Iraq was the ideal target for this and a
host of other strategic reasons.
Leadership of various anti-American groups both here and
abroad understood the vital nature of the Bush initiative and thus
launched their demonstrations, worldwide, to "Stop The
War". Failing this, they also laid plans to build a political
campaign inside this country, with the War in Iraq as a plebiscite,
using a little known politician as the thrust point –– Howard
Dean. This helps to explain how quickly the Radical Left moved into
the Dean campaign with both people and money, creating what the
clueless media called the "Dean Phenomenon".
By
building on the left-wing base in the Democrat party and the
"Hate Bush" crowd, the campaign has already resulted in a
consensus among the aspirants, minus Joe Lieberman, to withdraw the
U.S. from Iraq and turn the operation over to the U.N. And, if past
is prologue, i.e., Vietnam, once the U.S. leaves it will not go back
under any circumstances, possibly even the destruction of Israel.
Should George W. Bush be defeated in November we could expect to see
the dominoes start to fall in the secular Islamic countries and The
Clash of Civilizations, predicted several years ago by Samuel
Huntington, would then become a life-changing event in all of our
lives.
What
surprised the Jihadists following the 9/11 attacks was how American
sentiment mobilized around the president and a profound sense of
patriotism spread across the country. They were not expecting this
reaction, based on what had happenned in the past, nor were they
expecting the determined resolve of the President himself. I also
believe this is one of the reasons we have not had any further
attacks within our borders. They are content to wait, just as one of
their tactical mentors; V.I. Lenin admonished..."two steps
forward, one step back".
A
couple of additional events serve as valuable footnotes to the
current circumstances we face: the destruction of the human assets
factor of the CIA during the Carter presidency, presided over by the
late Senator Frank Church. This fact has plagued our intelligence
agencies right up to this very day with consequences which are now
obvious. And, Jimmy Carter himself, the one man who must bear the
bulk of the responsibility for setting the stage of the Third Jihad.
Americans should find little comfort in how the Democrat contenders
constantly seek the "advice and counsel" of this
despicable hypocrite.
Lastly,
we should not expect to see any meaningful cooperation from Western
Europe, especially the French. Since failing to protect their own
interests in Algeria (by turning the country over to the first of
the Arab terrorists, Ammad Ben Bella), the country itself is now
occupied by Islamic immigrants totalling twenty percent of the
population.
We
are in the battle of our lives, a battle which will go on for many
years, possibly even generations. If we fail to understand what we
are facing or falter in the challenge of "knowing our
enemy" the results will be catastrophic. Imagine a world where
al Qaeda regimes control 75% of the world's oil, have at their
disposal nuclear weapons, legions of willing suicide soldiers, and
our national survival is dependent on the good graces of Kofi Annan
and the United Nations.
There
is one final footnote which may be the scariest of all. Either none
of the Democrats currently leading the drive to their party's
nomination are aware of the facts of the Great Caliphate and Third
Jihad or they do know and they don't care so long as their power
lust is satisfied.
But,
I can guarantee you one thing for sure: some of their most ardent
supporters are aware of this and will do anything they can to bring
it about.
Disclaimer Copyright |