Sayan
Majumdar has portrayed a scenario of Chinese
maritime expansion aims and what may happen in the
event of a Sino-Indian conflict in the Indian Ocean
and South China Sea regions, in the future. He then
concludes that only the Indian Navy may be able to
effectively counter the threat. Food for thought
which our naval planners and national leadership
should ponder.
In
January 2005 the Washington Times had disclosed an
internal report prepared for US Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld pointing to an ambitious Chinese
plan to extend its maritime and naval influence
beyond the South China Sea. The new area of
influence encompassed the Indian Ocean to access the
Middle East to project Chinese naval power overseas
and protect its oill shipments. In initial “low
key” measures China is seeking to use commercial
port facilities around the world to control
strategic ocean routes and "chokepoints”. The
long term objective appears to be to militarily
control oil shipping sea lanes. Already a Chinese
company with close ties to Beijing's communist
rulers holds long-term leases on port facilities at
either end of the Panama Canal.
The
“high-profile” Gwadar port in southwest Pakistan
next to Iran is being built by China, which could
well be China's outlet port for oil and gas from
Central Asia. Beijing was swift to set up Electronic
Support Measures (ESM) eavesdropping posts at Gwadar,
capable of monitoring ship traffic through the
strategically sensitive Straits of Hormuz and the
Arabian Sea. Meanwhile at the eastern corner of the
Indian subcontinent Bangladesh had been approached
for naval and commercial access, with China building
a container port facility at Chittagong.
In
the words of Chinese President Hu Jintao, China
faces a "Malacca Dilemma" or the
vulnerability of its imported oil supply lines from
the Middle East and Africa to possible blockage of
United States Navy (USN) and its allies, in the
event of any possible hostilities near the Malaysian
archipelago and thus severely crippling China, by
blocking its energy supply needs. Although alarming
from the Indian strategic point-of-view, China has
successfully turned Myanmar into a “satellite”
by developing close ties and providing military
assistance to the military regime. Myanmar is
situated close to the Straits of Malacca, through
which eighty percent of China's imported oil passes.
Now buzzing with Chinese naval buildups and
activities naval bases are being built and
electronic intelligence gathering facilities are
being constructed on islands in the Bay of Bengal
and near the Straits of Malacca. Having already
built up "listening posts" at strategic
points, severe complications may arise for India, if
China manages to deploy a sizable military force at
Tenasserim, in assistance with Myanmar, to protect
the interests of both itself and the military junta.
Recently
China signed a military agreement with Cambodia in
November 2003 to provide training and equipment,
while Cambodia is helping Beijing to build a railway
line from southern China to the sea. for rapid
movement of troops and logistics if necessary. In
Thailand China is considering funding construction
of a $20 billion canal across the Isthmus of Kra,
which would allow ships to bypass the Straits of
Malacca. The canal project will additionally provide
China port facilities, warehouses and other
infrastructure in Thailand. Interestingly, among the
Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN)
member states, Thailand and Myanmar are considered
to be “close” to the Chinese leadership while
the other members do view Chinese long term
strategic aims with suspicion.
China
is also building up its military forces in the South
China Sea region for projection of air and naval
power on the Chinese mainland and Hainan Island.
Hainan came to international limelight in 2001, when
one USN EP-3E Aries II ELINT platform on “routine
duty” was compelled to force land on the island
after colliding with and destroying a Chinese F-8
‘Finback’ fighter aircraft. China recently
upgraded a military airstrip on Woody Island and
increased its presence through oil drilling
platforms and ocean survey ships. The Chinese
already dominate the Parcael and Spratly Islands
from which the PLAN can move to the Indian Ocean
through the Malacca, Sunda, Lombok and Sumba
straits. The possession of Spratly Islands have
developed into a potentially fierce point of
conflict as three nations, China, Taiwan and Vietnam
claim those island territories in totality with
partial claims from Malaysia, Philippines and
maritime claims from Brunei. Even if no significant
Chinese surface combatants are deployed in and
around the Indian Ocean in the near term, a couple
of nuclear powered attack submarines my move in for
semi-permanent deployment.
China
has already received the first of eight Type 636
Russian Kilo Class “hunter-killer” Submarines (SSK).
Designed for Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW),
Anti-Surface unit Warfare (ASuW) and for general
reconnaissance missions, the Type 636 submarine is
considered to be one of the quietest SSKs in the
world, with an impressive array of sensors and
matching weapons. By 2010, the Peoples Liberation
Army Navy (PLAN) is expected to number approximately
seventy modern surface combatants; two to three
ballistic-missile armed submarines (SSBN); and 20 to
30 modern attack submarines, perhaps six of them
nuclear-powered (SSN). The Marine Corps, recently
expanded from one to two brigades, may add a third
unit although its assault mission will keep it
tasked to the South and possibly the East Sea Fleets
as they are relatively small and thinly spread. The
Marine Corps incidentally is equipped with the
finest of the Chinese armed forces “ground
weapons” and its standard of training remains
substantially higher than Peoples Liberation Army (PLA).
The production and development of support vessels
such as transport craft and landing ships was also
being stepped up for transportation of men and
materials in decent numbers to enhance strategic
sealift capabilities for tackling any Taiwan related
crisis.
A
new generation of conventional and nuclear attack as
well as missile submarines is being developed to
replace the PLAN outdated Ming-class conventional
powered patrol submarines (SS), first-generation Han
Class SSN and Xia Class SSBN. The first hull of the
new generation Type 093 SSN, which is equivalent to
the USN early production Los Angeles Class SSN, is
reported to have been launched with Russian help in
the past year or so and is expected to enter service
soon. More than six vessels of the indigenously
developed Song-class SS have so far been built. The
initial development of the Song encountered
significant design and engineering problems,
especially related to propulsion, but they appear to
have been resolved and are now coming off the
production lines at a rate of one annually. The PLAN
is putting great emphasis on "undersea
retaliatory capability to protect the sea lanes“
of its interests. Thus presently the emphasis is
clearly on sea denial.
The
Type 052C Lanzhou Class guided missile destroyer (DDG)
has been developed by the Chinese shipbuilding
industry and is equipped with stealth features and a
long-range area air-defence Surface-to-Air Missile
(SAM) system that has been compared to the early
models of the USN Ticonderoga Class AEGIS cruiser.
The Type 052C shares the same hull design with the
Type 052B constructed by the same shipyard, but its
weapon systems and sensors are more advanced. The
Type 052C features a range of newly developed
systems including the HQ-9/S-300F area defence SAMs
launched from the vertical launching system (VLS),
the four-array multifunction phased array radar
similar to the U.S. AN/SPY-1 AEGIS, and the YJ-85
(C-805) anti-ship missile.
The
first ship of this class was delivered to the PLAN
last summer and a second vessel was to be completed
later this year. Their weapons systems are reported
to be similar to the modified Soveremenyy Class DDG
that PLAN had acquired from Russia delivered in
December 1999 and November 2000. Two more DDG are
due to be delivered in 2005 and 2006. In addition to
the devastating 3M80E Moskit anti-ship missiles the
Sovremennyy design has provided for the first time a
decent area-defence SAM capability to the Chinese
Navy in the shape of SA-N-7 ‘Gadfly‘ area
defence SAM. Significantly, the Chinese aircraft
designers are reported to be working on design of an
aircraft carrier based fighter and thus may be
logically deducted that in not too distant future
the PLAN will opt for aircraft carries to establish
local air superiority over high seas and conduct
sustained strike missions against enemy coastal
facilities and further inland.
The
capabilities of the PLAAF also received a great
boost with the induction of Sukhoi-30MKK multi-role
air dominance fighters enabling the service to
project for the first time in history a
state-of-the-art air threat well in excess of
1,850-km (radius of action), thanks to buddy
refueling sorties and stand-off missiles. The radius
of action in course of time may be sufficiently
boosted by induction if in-flight refueling (IFR)
tankers. As things stand a total of 78 Sukhoi-30MKK
variants are projected to enter PLAAF service with
at least few examples moving to the PLAN command.
The PLAAF and PLAN are also putting adequate
stress on procurement of force-multipliers and
target acquisition systems such as Airborne Warning
& Control System (AWACS), optical satellites and
maritime Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV). It is
possible that China has converted some of their
Russian origin Tupolev-16 ‘Badger’ medium
bombers and Illyushin-76 ‘Candid’ freighters to
In-Flight Refueling (IFR) platforms. In addition the
PLAAF is clearly interested on the Illyushin-78
‘Midas’ IFR tankers.
The
Chinese maritime ambitions are bound to face serious
challenges from a number of Asian and “overseas”
nations possessing formidable maritime power
unilaterally or as a “block”. After all the
Chinese policy of “strategic expansion” and
frequent switch between assertion and conciliation
are widely viewed with strong suspicion. India's
geographical position has permitted her to influence
maritime traffic in the Indian Ocean that originates
from the Persian Gulf or Straits of Hormuz or Cape
of Good Hope towards the Far East. A significant
amount of fossil fuel especially petroleum moves in
these sea routes along with raw materials also
essential for the developed Western World and Japan.
No wonder the United States Navy keeps a heavy naval
presence in the Indian Ocean Region in the form of
the Seventh Fleet and is the undisputed strongest
naval force in the Indian Ocean region.
In
addition, one USN nuclear powered aircraft carrier (CVN)
is permanently stationed in Yokosuka, Japan, to
respond to possible contingencies. The British held
island of Diego Garcia serves as an important
strategic base for strike missions and
pre-positioned stocks for the USN. The British Royal
Navy and the French Marine Nationale (Navy) further
cooperate with the USN. The French Navy itself
possessed a small naval base at Saint Denis in
Reunion Islands and have a separate Indian Ocean
Theatre Command (ALINDIEN). Interestingly now there
is enough indication of renewal of Japanese maritime
ambitions in the Indian Ocean and West Pacific with
projected construction of "Flat Tops" and
a desire for out of area deployments. The resurgent
Russian Navy will also in course of time maintain a
heavy naval presence in the Indian Ocean usually as
powerful detachments from Russian Black Sea and
Pacific Fleets dominated by Udaloy Class ASW
Destroyers like Admiral Vinogradov and Admiral
Pantelyev. After all it is enormously economical and
convenient to transport materials from
"European Russia" to the Far East Russian
landmass by the sea route than by Trans-Siberian
Railway and the sea lanes need to be kept open.
Possibly
as a counterbalance the Indian Navy and USN have
already initiated active cooperation and joint
patrolling in selected strategic areas of the Indian
Ocean. The eastern periphery and narrow waterways
around the Straits of Malacca seem to be the "favourite
choice". An ASW patrol in the narrow waterways
of various straits will keep track of surface and
sub-surface movements and deployment from one
operational area to another in addition to combating
notorious piracy in the region. As a sign of
significant expansion of ambitious cooperation, the
Indian Navy has now geared up for deployment in the
Persian Gulf region at least for limited periods and
that too with a powerful Surface Action Group
comprising of Delhi Class Destroyers and Talwar (Krivak
III) Class Frigates with support ships.
For
long-term strategic requirements and naval
operations, it is perhaps high time to create a
separate Indian Far East Naval Command for extensive
operations in South-East Asia around the Straits of
Malacca and South China Sea in active cooperation
with United States and other allied littoral navies.
Indeed this particular command will “draw in”
heavy resources both in material and financial terms
but the strategic advantages it will provide to the
Indian political leadership and naval commanders
will far outweigh its “resources”. Since the key
potential military, industrial, commercial targets
and related infrastructure of China are located
along its east coast, they could be subjected to
intensive air strikes by Indian Navy strike fighters
operating from aircraft carriers and by cruise
missiles fired from major surface and sub-surface
combatants in the event of a failure of Sino-Indian
dialogue and negotiations and outbreak of
hostilities. These counter-force, counter-value and
Suppression of Enemy Air Defence (SEAD) operations
conducted “from sea” will be able to bypass the
formidable Chinese network of terrestrial radars and
integrated Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) systems at
considerable length at the waypoints of high-value
targets.
China
has enjoyed the advantage of holding the
“heights” on the Himalayan front and the
presence of a “comfortable buffer” and strategic
depth as against India, after the occupation of
Tibet. Thus even the Indian Air Force strike
missions with present force structure will remain at
best limited to Chinese invasion routes in Tibet and
southern China. Only a formidable and flexible naval
presence in the South China Sea in active
cooperation with allied navies will remove the
geopolitical constraints and even in peacetime will
present a robust political tool in the hands of
Indian national leadership. The Indian presence
around the Straits of Malacca and at South China Sea
should comprise of at least one aircraft carrier,
one nuclear powered ballistic missile firing
submarine (SSBN), two multi-purpose nuclear
“hunter-killer” attack submarines (SSN) capable
of firing Land Attack Cruise Missiles (LACM) and
associated major surface combatants and support
ships. The access to United States and allied naval
and air bases in the Pacific and pre-positioned
naval stocks will prove vital. The French Marine
Nationale also maintains a separate Pacific Ocean
Theatre Command (ALPACI).
The
design of the first unit of India’s indigenous Air
Defence Ship (ADS) appears to have been frozen
around the pristine Italian Cavour design. At
DEFEXPO 04 in New Delhi the Italians displayed a
model which had remarkable similarities with
India’s ADS, and it evinced a lot of interest. The
ship has the LM 2500 gas turbines, five bladed CPP
propellers, one side lift and one lift forward and
the ski ramp. A strong feature of the design is its
high flexibility in operational terms. It is able to
carry out the functions of an aircraft carrier as
well as to transport wheeled and tracked vehicles,
for an amphibious assault role. The design is also
bound to be very useful in disaster management
missions and may be equipped with extensive hospital
facilities.
However
for a projected Indian Naval commitment in East Asia
the proposed second and third design should bear
closer resemblance to the French Charles de Gaulle
nuclear powered aircraft carrier (CVN) design,
constructed for Marine Nationale at the DCN Brest
naval shipyard in Brittany. Since operations in East
Asia will considerably “stretch” the logistical
capacity of the Indian Navy, the nuclear power
option may be the preferred choice. Nuclear
propulsion will also render these high-value capital
warships relatively invulnerable for their ability
to move and manoeuvre more freely, without excessive
dependence on fleet replenishments during
operations. With recent US intention to share
know-how regarding peaceful use of nuclear energy
the Indian political and naval leadership will do
well to secure the relevant technologies of the
“unlimited naval propulsion”.
Provision
should be made for futuristic steam catapults or
advanced electromagnetic aircraft
launch-and-recovery systems alike EMALS
(Electro-Magnetic Aircraft Launch System) being
developed by Kaman Electromagnetics, alongside an
internal-combustion catapult system fuelled by JP-5
jet fuel for the US CVNX project. This subject
remains a hot topic at contemporary Naval Air
Warfare Conferences. Such systems would permit the
operation of a truly composite aircraft mix of
fixed-wing airborne platforms of heavier air
dominance fighters like Russian Sukhoi-33
(Sukhoi-27K) as well as fixed-wing AWACS platforms
alike the US E-2C 'Hawkeye' that have considerably
greater range and endurance than similar helicopter
platforms. Fixed-wing AWACS platforms also have
superior coverage of airspace, posses significant
"overland" capability and more importantly
have the ability to guide and control ship borne
fighters towards their targets, an attribute the
Airborne Early Warning (AEW) helicopter platforms
like Kamov-31 lack. 'Hawkeye' operates from the
French PAN/CVN 'Charles de Gaulle'.
The
suggested operation of Russian Sukhoi-33 air
dominance fighters assumes significance in light of
two Indo–Russian jointly developed high-profile
missiles, the PJ-10 BrahMos Anti-Ship Cruise Missile
(ASCM) and possible follow-ups and the Novator R-172
ultra-long range Air-to-Air Missile (AAM). Only the
Indian Air Force Sukhoi-30MKI is capable of carrying
these two types of missiles to decisive effect in
operations in our fighter inventory. Sukhoi-33, if
operated by the Indian Navy in future, will be able
to do the same. Designed to fulfil the Beyond Visual
Range (BVR) role for “outer-air battles”, an
aircraft usually of Sukhoi-27/30/33/35/37
“Flanker/Super Flanker” family, equipped with
R-172 will be able to engage ultra-high-value
airborne platforms like enemy AWACS, In-Flight
Refueling (IFR) and Long Range Maritime Patrol (LRMP)
platforms, without necessarily having first to deal
with their fighter escorts. The attributes of the
air-launched PJ-10 BrahMos will be discussed at
later part of this article. For now it is sufficient
to state that the Sukhoi-33/R-172/BrahMos
combination will constitute a significant and much
needed punch against the Chinese surface and
airborne threats including Sukhoi-30MKK fighters and
Sovremannyy and Lanzhou Class DDG.
The
ADS should also be equipped with a formidable
multi-tier SAM combination to defeat a full spectrum
of air threats that range from low-flying strike
aircraft to sea-skimming anti-ship missiles fired
from both strike aircraft and significantly from
submerged submarines, offering a far greater
challenge. Since the European missile and smart
munitions manufacturer MBDA now enjoys close
co-operation with Indian defence industry, it may be
logical to go for MBDA developed Principal Anti-Air
Missile System (PAAMS) being developed for
Franco-Italian Horizon class frigates, working with
Empar C-band radar. PAAMS is a combination of
vertically launched rapid reaction, active-radar
Aster 15 and Aster 30 missiles. Aster 15 has a range
of 1.7 to 30-km and is operational aboard French
aircraft carrier 'Charles de Gaulle' with a
combination of the Arabel X-band radar. Aster 30 in
addition to self-defence has area defence capability
with 3 to 100-km range.
An
Anti-Tactical Ballistic Missile (ATBM) capable SAM
is considered a prerequisite as aircraft-carrier
battle groups, if detected, may invite nuclear
ballistic missile strikes resulting in considerable
damage. The French are working on an ATBM capable
Aster version while the option of United States
Standard SM-2 and follow on variants seems to be
open. This ATBM system may be mounted on the ADS
itself or on its "principal escort". Since
the Indian Navy was opting for at least three ADS,
at least one needs to be built abroad or acquired
for swift induction in Indian Navy fleet.
While
the SSBN in the shape of the indigenous Advanced
Technology Vessel (ATV) will provide the much needed
nuclear deterrence against China with considerable
effect if operated around South China Sea and armed
with projected 2,500-km missiles, the multi-purpose
SSNs like Akula II will enjoy the flexibility of
operations along with the major surface combatants.
The teeth of these platforms will be the supersonic
PJ-10 BrahMos Anti-Ship Cruise Missile (ASCM)
subsequently modified for diverse applications and
launch platforms like warships, submarines,
aircrafts and land-platforms. A joint venture
between Indian DRDO and Russian NPO
Mashinostroyeniya (NPO Mash) the air-launched
version to be developed will have a smaller booster
and additional tail fins for stability during
launch. The missile with a low Radar Cross Section (RCS)
will sport an Active Radar Homing (ARH) seeker to
facilitate fire-and-forget launch while varieties of
flight trajectories will complicate the task of the
adversary. A 290-km long flight range with high
supersonic (Mach 2.8) speed will lead to lower
target dispersion and quicker engagement and higher
destructive capability aided by the large kinetic
energy of impact. In most of the cases the target
warship will be denied sufficient time to react.
The
BrahMos will turn out to be an even more deadly ASCM
if the Indian software designers have by now matured
the already formidable guidance system of the
BrahMos predecessor SS-N-26 Yakhont which has
accumulated all the NPO Mash experience in
developing electronic systems of Artificial
Intelligence (AI). Thus in case of a salvo launch a
flock of BrahMos will be able to allocate and range
targets by their importance and choose the attack
implementation plan. The independent control system
will take care of the Electronic Counter Measures (ECM)
and Electronic Counter-Counter Measures (ECCM) data,
and also the methods of evading the fire of the
enemy's air defense systems. After destroying the
main target in a CVBG or surface action group, the
remaining missiles will destroy the other ships
eliminating in the process the possibility of using
two missiles on single target.
Of
equal importance is the induction of an
"extended range" BrahMos ASCM to further
increase the stand-off distance and range as hinted.
These missiles after-all offer the attraction of
stand-off ranges and do not require launch platforms
to enter hostile airspace or territory or operate
close to the shore. Meanwhile as part of Alfa
next-generation airborne reconnaissance and strike
system, NPO Mash unveiled the Yakhont-M supersonic
ASCM at the MAKS 2003 air show, that share elements
with the PJ-10 BrahMos. The Yakhont-M is an
air-launched ASCM intended for Sukhoi-30 multi-role
fighters, Sukhoi-34 and Sukhoi-24M strike fighters
with multi-sensor guidance, to engage surface ships
and ground targets at up to 300-km. Reconnaissance
and target acquisition would be provided by radar
and electro-optical equipped Kondor low-Earth-orbit
satellites. A passive radiation homing
"extended range" BrahMos if developed,
will fulfill an Indian Navy requirement of a
formidable Suppression of Enemy Air Defence (SEAD)
Land Attack Cruise Missile (LACM). LACMs especially
submarine launched, are invaluable assets of any
major navy, and are likely to be used in decimating
enemy overland communications, command and control
centres and powerful air defence installations
before extensive barrage air attack followed by
ground invasion if necessary. The USN has repeatedly
demonstrated this concept in the past two decades
over Middle East and Balkans with considerable
success. It is one of the prime reasons for early
accomplishments in operations and low US casualties.
Also
the projected acquisition of Tupolev-22M3
(Backfire-C) for the Indian Navy is a significant
step as the 'M3' version is designed for strategic
bombing/maritime strike and entered service in
Soviet Dalnaya Aviatsiya (DA) or Long-Range Aviation
and AV-MF or Naval Aviation during early 1980s. In
Indian Navy service its main weapon is projected to
be the air-launched variant of supersonic
Indo-Russian PJ-10 BrahMos Anti-Ship Cruise Missile
(ASCM) and possibly a capability to carry nuclear
bombs that Defence Research and Development
Organization (DRDO) and Bhaba Atomic Research Centre
(BARC) say are available. If primary high speed
reconnaissance role is also the peace time role
intended, Tupolev-22MR is the alternative choice
since the 'MR' version carries a giant Side Looking
Airborne Radar (SLAR) in what was previously the
internal bomb bay. The ’MR’ version also has a
large dielectric fairing at the root of the vertical
fin along with dielectric fairings on the fuselage.
The
Tupolev-22M ‘Backfire’ is a multi-mission strike
platform capable of performing low-level nuclear
strike and conventional attack, anti-ship strike and
high-seed reconnaissance missions. Powered by two
Kuznetsov NK25 turbofan engines they have an
unrefuelled range of at least 7,000-km+ at high
altitude. This impressive range can be optimally
utilized if one-way missions can be flown against
the target nations or In-Flight Refueling (IFR) is
applied. The maximum speed can reach 2300-km/h at
high altitude with 12 tons of strike ordnance
carried externally. A single air launched cruise
missile can be carried in semi-recessed form to
reduce drag. There is also presence of at least one
internal rotary launcher.
The
radar is speculated to be of the missile guidance
‘Down Beat’ family. In Soviet DA and AV-MF
service the Tupolev-22M ‘Backfire’ carried the
most formidable avionics and Electronic Warfare (EW)
suite and were feared and respected by the
adversaries. Most of the EW suites were “flush
mounted” and thus not optically apparent and did
not hamper aerodynamic performance. During the
height of Cold War the ‘Backfire’ achieved
notoriety in NATO eyes for repeated simulated launch
of cruise missiles against the NATO Aircraft-Carrier
Battle Groups (CVBG) and penetrating the formidable
Japanese air-defence network at will. These were
bound to be carefully planned Electronic
Intelligence (ELINT)/ferret missions and tactics to
test and record NATO Strike Fleet and Japanese air
defence tactics and procedures. Operating from
forward bases in the European Landmass the Soviet
Tupolev-22Ms were active over North Atlantic as far
as Azores and were considered a significant threat
to NATO surface Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW)
barriers in the key areas such as
Greenland-Iceland-UK (GIUK) gaps. Operating from
bases in the far-east the ‘Backfire’ were active
over North Pacific and it was projected that if air
bases were made available in South or Central
American Marxist influenced Nations “one-way”
strategic “over Artic” missions could be flown
against the United States.
Thus
amply apparent, operating from centrally located
Indian Naval Bases with benefit of IFR, the
Tupolev-22M3 will be well capable of delivering
strategic punch throughout the Asian landmass and
water bodies and beyond. However ‘Backfire’s
exported/leased to third world nations lacked the
sophisticated avionics and EW suite and the Indian
Navy would do well to integrate European/Israeli
radar, avionics and detection systems with the
Indian Navy’s Tupolev-22M3s. The Russians are also
projecting an upgraded Tupolev-22M5 version with new
radar, avionics, Electronic Warfare (EW) and
navigation systems and the Indian Navy may choose to
evaluate them.
Indian
Navy Tupolev-22M in addition should carry the
high-speed Kh-31 (AS-17 ‘Krypton‘) Anti-Radar
Missile (ARM) first tested in 1982, for SEAD role.
The formidable missile is first accelerated by a
solid-fuel rocket engine to a speed of Mach 1.8.
Thereafter, the module is discarded and the interior
of the missile is converted into the combustion
chamber of the missile’s jet engine as four
air-intake holes on the sides of the missile body
open up accelerating the missile to almost Mach 4.5.
Providing very little reaction time to enemy air-defence
networks the 200-km ranged Kh-31 will be able to
effectively destroy enemy air defence installations
comprising of radar and Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM)
sites on the way to its prime targets. In this
respect the Kh-31 fulfills the role of United States
Air Force (USAF) AGM-161 SRAM or the Russian Kh-15
(AS-16 Kickback) although the USAF and Russian
inventory weapons are fitted with nuclear warheads.
The
dedicated reconnaissance variant Tupolev-22MR can
conduct aerial reconnaissance from a great slant
distance without having to over-fly its intended
'targets', thanks to the SLAR. However, prudence
dictates that the Indian Navy should settle for at
least three "compact" squadrons (6 to 10
aircraft each) of the Tupolev-22M3/M5/MR in
appropriate mix. Since START 2 (Strategic Arms
Reduction Talks) had debarred the 'Backfire' from
carrying nuclear weapons, there may not be any
shortage of 'surplus' in Russia. The Russian 37th
Strategic Air Army comprising of the 22nd Guards Red
Banner Donbass Heavy Bomber Division and the 79th
Guards Heavy Bomber Division is more obsessed with
upgradation of its Tupolev-160 'Blackjack' and
Tupolev-95MS6/MS16 'Bear' fleets and testing and
induction of Kh-101 and Kh-65 ALCM.
The
Tupolev-22M fleet will join the Indian Navy
Illyushin-38 MR/ASW platforms undergoing Morskoy
Zmei (Sea Dragon) multi-mission avionics and
electronic warfare suite updates designed by
Leninets to Illyushin-38SD standard. The fully
digital Sea Dragon suite is designed to detect and
intercept surface vessels and submarines within a
range of 150-km, as well as detect mines and carry
out surveillance. The suite can also detect airborne
targets and can be linked to the Russian GLONASS
satellite navigation system. It encompasses a new
Synthetic-Aperture/Inverse-Synthetic-Aperture Radar
(SAR/ISAR) located in a canoe fairing on the belly,
a high-resolution Forward-Looking Infra-Red (FLIR)
sensor, a Low-Light Television (LLTV) camera, a new
Electronic-Support-Measures (ESM) system and a new
Magnetic Anomaly Detector (MAD) system in the aft
section of the aircraft. The Illyushin-38SDs will
also be fitted with radio-frequency and infrared
sensors, as well as decoys. If everything goes well
according to plans the Indian Navy MR/ASW platforms
will be further augmented by the United States
Lockheed Martin P-3C plus Orions with their
additional highly sophisticated ESM gear and
Command, Communications, Control and intelligence
facilities.
Peacetime
traditionally have very little effect in the
deployment and operational role of MR/ASW platforms.
The task of multi-national naval cooperation on
operational theatre will thus fall on Indian Navy MR/ASW
platforms while monitoring surface and sub-surface
vessels in and around the Indian Ocean as a way of
providing early warning of possible confrontation or
conflict and distribution of naval units. Usually
these roles will be multi-national affairs between
India, United States and possibly Japan with data
and information transmitted and shared between MR/ASW
platforms of several nations for constant monitoring
of surface and sub-surface naval activities. It is
apparent that in future budgetary reallocations in
defence sector are critical for the crucial naval
build up. Awareness should be created that naval
dominance brings along with it increased security
and economic prosperity to the nation in favourable
proportions. The exploits of Great Britain during
the last century serve as a good example.
(*Sayan
Majumdar is a commerce graduate from Calcutta
University. A qualified C++ programmer from IIT
Kharagpur, he is a correspondent and writer on
Military Affairs.)