New
Delhi, 12 December 2004
The
Internet has become the all pervasive driver of
tomorrow’s activities be it governance, banking,
health, trade, entertainment, security, command and
control or dissemination of information. Hence the
oft repeated and hackneyed phrase Revolution in
Military Affairs (RMA), which the Americans coined
over a decade ago based on the Russian General
Ogarov’s, Military Technological Revolution (MTR).
The
Russians were the first to recognize the march of
technology for transmission of data and accepted the
fact that NATO forces were becoming technologically
superior to their overwhelming nuclear capable
Warsaw Pact forces. RMA became the mantra but it may
be passé now that the technology has settled for
the time being till another leap appears in the
years ahead. C4I has come to stay. This
trend is now evident at most security conferences.
The
“IQPC Asian Fighter Conference”, chaired by our
representative from India was held in Singapore in
the last week of October. The credit for selecting
an Indian to be the Chairman, goes to the Indian Air
Force. They made their mark in many air combat
exercises at Gwalior in 2004, with the French,
Singapore and US Air Forces and abroad in Alaska and
South Africa, with NATO nations participating.
Labelled as the first and most impressive peacetime
display of the IAF’s professionalism to foreign
aviators, though several accidents have plagued
India’s Air Force.
There
is now a healthy respect for the Indian pilots and
their flying machines (the older MiG 21s, 27s and
Jaguars) and (newer MiG 29s, Mirage 2000 and SU 30
MKI). But the coup de grace of the Fighter
Conference and others that have followed in India
including the recent National Security Seminar at
the USI, was the coining of a new term TSA ––
Transformation in Security Affairs.
TSA now
keeps cropping up every so often from the lips of
the senior military officers, defence analysts,
foreign policy makers and speakers at conferences,
because relationships between nations are no longer
dictated by groupings, but are based on national
interests, with all the strains of cooperation and
competition. In the future nations will have to live
with these two disparate features simultaneously.
Today even Europe and USA are in that scenario, and
the battle between Airbus and Boeing is a glaring
example. TSA therefore appears to be the new mantra
at a time when the scourge of terrorism is plagues
the world with no signs of letting up, and the world
is discussing Bush’s second term with great
introspection.
Interaction
and discussions with analysts, reps of military
industrial complexes, security and government
representatives from ten countries including USA,
Australia, France, UK, Korea, India and host
Singapore, witnessed the term TSA come up in their
presentations ad nauseam. The explanation was the
same –– that cooperation and sharing of
intelligence is a must to achieve stability, and
even those sharing intelligence could see
competition.
This
means that technology for net centric warfare as the
lynch pin for RMA has settled down in most modern
militaries, but TSA is possibly the byword for the
change in security relations and how nations will
deal with each other, in this new changing world.
TSA also dictates how nations purchase and their
sell their military hardware, and the recent visits
of Russia’s Defence Minister Sergiy Ivanov,
President Putin, France’s Foreign Minister,
Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Israeli Deputy
Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to India, also depict how
all security leaders wish to collaborate and offer
their spheres of influence and technology, and sell
their hardware in the most favourable manner to
India.
India’s
own initiative to bury the past and make peace with
Pakistan in a genuine manner by offering the LoC as
the IBL in a guarded manner and other concessions,
is also a thread in this direction. India is also
busy forging closer military relations with South
and West Asia (Iran) and neighbours like Sri Lanka
and Myanmar, with Defence Agreements, to ensure
stability and look to energy security, another vital
ingredient for the future.
The
fighter conference was held in Singapore just when
the full range of Indian fighter jets minus the MiG
25s were battling the Republic of Singapore’s
F-16’s in Exercise ANKUSH over the skies in Madhya
Pradesh. Some Singapore reps had just returned from
Gwalior with hands on experience of Exercise Ankush
and were present at the conference and offered
comments. Exercise Cope India and Garuda held at
Gwalior with US F-15Cs (30 year old planes) and
French Mirage 2000’s were also dissected.
The
fighter conference attracted more than normal
attention because some $10 billion worth of fighter
jets are to be ordered in the next two years by
Singapore, Australia, India, Taiwan, Malaysia,
Canada and West Asia. The JSF F-35, F-16, F-22
(Raptor), Rafale (Dassault), Eurofighter (EADS),
Grippen (SAAB) and Mirages are variously in the
running. The Arabic word “bakshish” was brought
up by a Middle Eastern delegate and the Chairman was
asked to explain it in the Indian context!
The IAF
was lobbying to buy Mirage 2000Vs to replace the MiG
21/23 in 2008 or else their squadron strength will
deplete. The Chief of Air Staff ACM S Krishnaswamy
had recently declared that there was no middleman in
the deal for purchase of 10 Mirages. A company
called Keyser had gone to court in France to demand
its due commission (bakshish) for the deal. The
original order for these aircraft was placed by
Jordan, and financed by Saudi Arabia. However, on
commencement of the 1990 Iraq war, the Saudis did
not appreciate Jordan’s cosying up to Sadam Hussen
and withdrew the funding. Dassault desperately
looked for alternate solvent buyers and India signed
for them with an advance payment.
No big
aircraft manufacturer or ancillary supplier can
afford to miss the nuances or exposure to decision
makers that are available at such conferences. It
was interesting to learn that the UAE Air Force had
bought and was flying the more modern F-16 Block 60
not available to the USA, like IAF is flying the Su
30 MKI’s of the variety not available to the
Russian Air Force. These are Transformations in
Security Affairs, explained Maj Gen Dave, Deputy
Director Air and Space Operations from US Pacific
Air Command. He changed the title of his speech from
“Power Projection in the Pacific “ to
“Transforming Air Deployment in Air Space and US
power in the Pacific’. He heightened the
importance of trade and security relations, possibly
goaded by his diplomatic adviser.
The
Australians explained their F-15 operations and
upgrades in tandem with USAF and Canada. China was
repeatedly projected as a power shrouded in the Sun
Tzu edict of secrecy but a super power in the
making. Regional Air Force capabilities were covered
in depth and the Indian Air Force came out as a
Trojan horse to be watched. The capabilities of the
Su-30 MKI to take on the modern Mirages and F-18s
were speculated by professionals.
Yet the
most important lessons of the landmark conference
which military intelligence agencies, practicing
diplomats, security advisers and hardware sellers
need to heed, were that there is now a
transformation in security affairs and so the
acronym TSA could well replace RMA as an apt one for
the coming decade. Change is a constant and even in
India many of our military doctrines and MEA
policies including those towards Pakistan are
undergoing healthy transformations, which is
reassuring. It was hoped that Pakistan also releases
this. Another speaker explained the need for
interdependence. India was now viewed as a strategic
partner and could assist in ballistic missile
defence and cooperation to deal with terrorism. He
went on to say how the security approach must
transform, to accept the new multilateral era, where
even some non NATO members were to be treated like
partners for which renewed diplomatic efforts have
to instituted by nations. Need for interoperability
of forces and how Indian Navy patrolled for USA in
Malacca straits and how Air Forces can to cooperate
came in for mention.
The
need to ensure stability in the Middle East (Iraq
and Iran) and South Asia (India, Pakistan and
Afghanistan) came up from speaker after speaker
repeating the big worry that could be
destabilization. There was a fear that North Korea
could again sell nuclear technology to Iran, a
future independent Iraq and other Middle Eastern
countries who aspire to acquire the bomb. Mr Lee
Kwan Yew also highlighted this by saying that these
countries felt, if Pakistan and Israel have it why
can’t we?
Uttering
this thought mildly was another transformation not
earlier articulated, because it is the future that
was being discussed not so much the present. Colin
Powell’s statement from Beijing on Taiwan’s
reconciliation with China some day also came in for
discussion. Some very interesting themes were
developed on conflicts with air and space operations
linked with net centric warfare. This was another
hot topic. An American general who commands the
largest airbase in the world, Kadena in Okinhawa
with 23,000 personnel, explained it simply by
saying, “A pilot or a fighter going into battle
without net centric facilities would be like a
corporate executive having no Internet or Email in
his office. He would be doomed.
|