The cease fire in Sri Lanka has broken down as
the LTTE were let down by Karuna –– who is acting as the Mukhiti
Bahaini did in India's Bangladesh war. We had anticipated that
the Sri Lanka Army would use air power and India is watching as
Viako and others go on a day's fast. In his annual speech
Prabhakaran disowned the Cease Fire and Rajapakse asked the Indian
Navy to cooperate in patrols to keep LTTE from getting arms from the
sea. This is a task the Indian Navy's should perform. It is the PM’s
and EAM 's duty to force the LTTE leader to say what sort of
federalism he wants to join the election process or does India want
to break Sri Lanka into two? India cannot stand aside and watch.
In any case in India there is no C-in-C and so
who minds the store? During Kargil conflict we saw what a mess
command and control was, as NSA Brajesh Misra and then EAM Jaswant
Singh both asked for a status quo as revealed in ACM A Y Tipnis’
book. Both are not in the chain of command but even today maybe the
NSA and EAM are dictating policy and we will watch the results of
President Rajapakse's visit.
We do not agree with Mr B Raman who loves a wait
and watch policy.
COUNTER-TERRORISM AGAINST LTTE
By B. Raman
I receive a large number of letters from readers
relating to my recent articles on the counter-terrorism operations
of the Sri Lankan Government against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Eelam (LTTE).
2. A common theme of the letters is: "You used to
write so strongly against the LTTE as the most ruthless terrorist
organisation in the world. Why have you become so soft? You used to
be critical of the Ranil Wickemasinghe Government which you felt was
being soft to the LTTE, but now you are criticising the Mahinda
Rajapakse Government for being tough in its operations against the
LTTE. How can you make allegations that the Rajapakse Government is
deliberately targeting the Tamil community when you know that the
deaths of the Tamil civilians are nothing but unfortunate collateral
damage as a result of the strong action taken by the Government
against the LTTE?"
3. Let me first make clear what is my
understanding of the expression "collateral damage”, a term often
misused by security agencies to cover up the deaths of innocent
civilians. In my understanding, collateral damage is unintended
damage caused as a result of a pin-pointed action taken by the
security forces, who did not expect any civilian casualties, but
which took place all the same due to circumstances beyond their
control. We have many such examples in Jammu & Kashmir (J&K).The
terrorists open fire on a security forces patrol in an inhabited
area. They return the fire in exercise of their law-given right of
self-defence. Some passers-by are killed or injured. That is genuine
collateral damage.
4. When you consciously order a punitive air
strike, you cannot take excuse under the pretext that you did not
expect the bombs dropped from the air to kill innocent civilians.
When a stray bullet fired by you kills a passer-by during an
exchange of fire, you can legitimately defend yourself by saying
that you did not expect the bullet to kill an innocent civilian. You
cannot take the same excuse when you drop bombs from the air on an
inhabited area. The world is yet to discover a precision bomb which,
when dropped from the air, will identify and kill only the
terrorists. It will kill everybody in the vicinity of the area
where the bomb dropped. There may be circumstances when an air
strike may become unavoidable. For example, when the terrorists
surround a large number of civilians and threaten to massacre them
if their demands are not accepted. One has not come across such
instances in Sri Lanka. There have been instances even in Sri Lanka
when one could not have found fault with the Sri Lankan Government
for using its Air Force---for example, to go to the rescue of its
naval boats in the sea when they were surrounded by LTTE boats.
There was no danger of civilian casualties in such cases.
5. One of the reasons why there is so much anger
against the Americans in Afghanistan and Iraq is because of their
indiscriminate use of air strikes against suspected terrorists on
the ground. It is difficult to get accurate statistics, but sources
in whom I have confidence estimate that since 9/11 the US has killed
about 5,000 suspected or confirmed terrorists, but over 200,000
innocent civilians due to its policy of indiscriminate use of force
from the air and through heavy artillery during its
counter-terrorism operations. You cannot just dismiss these deaths
of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians as unavoidable
collateral damage.
6. In spite of this, I will say two things to
the credit of the Americans: First, whenever the death of innocent
civilians appears shocking, their immediate reflux is not to deny
them. They do order an enquiry and in some cases take action against
the guilty officers. Second, I have not heard of any
instance---either in Afghanistan or in Iraq or in the
Lebanon---where the Americans or the Israelis deliberately stopped
the flow of food, medicines and other essential articles to the
civilian population.
7. In Sri Lanka, under Mr. Rajapakse, the
immediate reflex of the Government and its spokesmen is to deny any
wrong-doing by the security forces. I am yet to come across a single
instance where any action has been taken by the Rajapakse Government
against the security forces for excesses against innocent civilians.
8. Like the British used to do in Malaya while
fighting the communist insurgency, the Rajapakse Government has been
using the stoppage of the flow of food, medicines and other
essential supplies to the Tamil population as a weapon of
intimidation in order to prevent the Tamil population from
supporting the LTTE.
9. While in service and subsequently too, I have
always believed it as an article of faith that the counter-terrorism
agencies must make a clear distinction between the terrorists and
the community from which they have arisen and should not punish the
community from which the terrorists have arisen. Many of the actions
of the Rajapakse Government tend to punish the Tamil community in
order to intimidate it into not supporting the LTTE. That is why I
find it difficult to support the manner in which it has been
conducting its counter-terrorism operations.
10. In 1993, jihadi terrorists in Jammu &
Kashmir occupied the holy Hazratbal shrine. After the termination of
the occupation, the security forces let the terrorists escape to
Pakistan instead of engaging them in an exchange of fire since they
were worried that an exchange of fire might result in large civilian
casualties. There are many other such instances in J&K where the
security forces have deliberately avoided an exchange of fire in an
inhabited area in order to avoid civilian casualties. That is
sophisticated counter-terrorism.
(The writer is Additional Secretary (retd),
Cabinet Secretariat, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and, presently,
Director, Institute For Topical Studies, Chennai. E-mail:itschen36@gmail.com)