New Delhi, 28
September 2003
From
a small exhibition held first outside London –– south of
Heathrow in 1999 to the DSEi 2003 –– a big show at a spanking
new location. “The Excel” in the Docklands Canary Wharf area of
London, has seen a stupendous growth indeed. The Dome and Greenwich
Observatory are close by. Right next-door is a quay with space to
berth 9 warships in deep waters on the Thames.
One
of the World’s leading Defence Expositions which now attracts
military attention of uniformed, civil and government personnel,
associated industries and export organizations from around the
world, the Defence Systems and Equipment International was held in
London from 9–12 Sep 2003. The exhibition this year was held in
association with the UK Ministry of Defence, supported by the UK
Defence Manufacturers Association, the British Naval Equipment
Association and Intellect, all of whom worked closely with the
Organisers.
DSEi
was now to be held every two years and had overtaken Defendory of
France and many other exhibitions. India’s own DEFEXPO 2002 was
about one fourth in size and quality but we learn that DEFEXPO 2004
will be bigger, as the CII will include Hall No 13 as well at
Pragati Maidan, and Defence exhibitions supported by Governments are
total money spinners. No one loses in Defence Exhibitions and Geoff
Hoon UK’s Defence Secretary proudly announced that UK was now the
second largest Defence Exporter after USA, though a recent US
Congress Report puts USA first followed by Russia and then France.
Exhibitions are also platforms for exports of the host country and
allow for wining and dining of those in uniform also without
pinching pockets.
India
must learn a lesson or two as India’s defence budget is one of the
largest for imports in the developing world and growing, but what it
now needs direly is exports. If bureaucrats let go the reins then
this would be possible. Yet we feel that this was unlikely as
Government wants to import for the hidden benefits and also hog the
exports in the name of security. Even though 26% FDI was permitted
in the Defence Sector, there was no headway and no Agents had been
cleared. We hope there is some renewed thinking and India can
announce some customers for the SU-30MKK, INSAS 5.56 mm rifle, BEL
Sonars, Avionics and the BRAHMOS Missile or some such so that these
can act as catalysts for defence exports.
This
year at DSEI, 950 companies from 28 countries took part and at the
outset one must mention India and Pakistan did not put up stalls but
both countries had their Defence Attaches and delegations at the
show. India and Pakistan must have sent some Intelligence Agency
reps as these exhibitions are a treasure trove of information and
contacts.
The
Indian Navy team of three was led by a Gunnery specialist VADM Raman
Puri FOC in C East, Indian Navy’s third most senior officer, who
has since been named Chief of Integrated Staff to the Chairman
Chiefs of Staff (CISC). The Confederation of Indian Industries had
sent a business delegation of 11 mainly from Tatas, steel companies
and private operators who supply to the MOD or have collaborations.
Some were looking for exports. There were only some twenty other
Indians to be seen at the show, and they were reps of companies like
BEL, Mahindras and others who do agency work for Defence
Manufacturing Association of UK as also a few journalists.
There
were top brass and uniforms of all hues at the show from all over
the world. The delegations were well hosted by the DESO ––
Defence Exports Organization of UK. Some 42 military delegations
were officially invited from all over the world including two
officers from Pakistan but it is Indians who were lucky for the
timing of the show held special interest. India’s CCS had just
cleared the $1.4 bill 66 AJT BAe Hawk for purchase from UK, 7 EW
systems from Rafale of Israel and upgraded equipment for the Army,
so the Indians at the show were very well received. They know that
the Indian Defence budget will get spent this year. S Africa already
had orders for an ammunition factory in George Fernandes’s
constituency in Bihar and was looking to win the 155mm Gun contract
and build on the BHIM with a G-6 Turret and France awaited the six
Scorpene submarines deal at US$1.4 billion.
The
Americans were confused on how they should approach India. An
absolutely unconfirmed story doing the rounds at the show was that
there were two camps in India’s defence procurement system, with
two lobbies –– one controlled by Ministry of Defence and the
other by the PMO and the National Security Adviser. The purchase
system for defence hardware and timing of the CCS meetings for their
clearance were a ‘mystery wrapped in an enigma’ –– as
Churchill may have said –– for the companies who do business so
they keep all happy. The vintage Official Secrets Act also dictated
that no progress was made to make the system more transparent. At
the show the Western world’s purchases and contracts were all
public knowledge and that surprised an Indian. The status of our
conventional purchases were known to the Western world as LOIs and
PNCs were initiated, but little was known about them in India.
Jane’s Defence Stall had experts on all subjects and if any
queries needed answering about India that was the place to go. Yet
everyone talked ‘off the record’ in the case of India.
As the organizers indicated this
was the third event in the DSEi series and the second to be held at
the world-class Excel venue, where the catering was superb. We can
now confirm that Defence and Security doctrines had been rewritten
in the last two years against a background of continuing operations
in many parts of the world including the war in Iraq, with the words
terrorism, littoral warfare, preemptive defence and attack from sea
taking center stage. Hence the emphasis from the cold war days had
completely changed. Defence equipment now had sophistication in
software and lethality. The rates of failure of systems and weapons
had reduced. These changes were the focus of many conversations
during the exhibition and its associated conferences. At the same
time, the event served as a showcase for the latest scientific and
technological advances in defence capability, much of it being
network enabled. For us some of the advances were mind boggling. The
launch of new equipment, missiles, C4I systems, unveiling
the latest designs and the announcement of new collaborative
projects were the hallmarks of DSEi.
During
the week there were disturbances as peace objectors sat on the
Dockland Railway lines to object to the show of weapons yet some
20,000 visitors traveled from around the world and UK to see the
defence systems and services offered by more than 900 companies from
28 countries. In addition to the 16 national pavilions led by host
UK, USA, France, Germany, Europe and the major corporate stands, a
spotlight was laid on the group of visiting warships, berthed
immediately alongside the exhibition hall. They included a type 23
HMS Grafton, a minesweeper HMS Bangor from UK, the French Frigate
anti sours-marine Latouche Treville, Minesweeper M-917 Crocus from
Netherlands. The ships were visited with enthusiasm and all
equipment was kept switched on.
A
special feature area for Unmanned Systems and Training &
Simulation was introduced and a greater tri-service exhibition
approach was seen with the Eurofighter Typhoon and an Apache
helicopter on display. For India BAe, CAE (which provides Indian
Navy AIO solutions), Alsthom (provides gear box engine mesh for IN),
Dockwise (carried Kilo subs to Russia on deck) , Delft and Diehl
(involved in Arjun) , Raytheon Thales (WLRs ANTPQ 47 suppliers), DCN
(Scorpene suppliers with Thales and Amaris), Rolls Royce, MBDA,
Alenia, Oto Melara and a host of other companies like these could
keep the inquisitive visitor occupied while sipping some red wine
which was good for health. The conference was also very informative.
In all DSEi lived up to the expectation of the visitors.
UK
and DSEi 2003
The
defence industry was now involved in collaborative and joint venture
projects –– and DSEi recognized that trend with more than half
of the companies this year coming from overseas. They ranged in size
from small and medium-sized enterprises to international primes.
As
Mr. Geoff Hoon stated, “We are justifiably proud of the
capabilities of the United Kingdom’s defence industry, which
contributes in full measure to the enviable reputation of our armed
forces. I would particularly like to acknowledge the industry’s
outstanding support during operations. Our partnership with industry
is excellent, and companies in the United Kingdom continue to
demonstrate that they can produce superlative equipment and support
it under the most demanding conditions. I am sure that our guests
will also recognize the need for the robust controls that are the
hallmark of the responsible defence exporter. The United Kingdom
adheres to the strict Consolidated EU and National Arms Export
Licensing Criteria, and, within those guidelines, the Government
fully supports our industry in offering high quality, through-life
solutions”.
Disclaimer Copyright |